Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) vs Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen wins Mic Inputs, Monitoring and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $149.99, so the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) stays the pick if $10 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) | Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Preamps | 9.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Connectivity | 2/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
Compact 1-mic USB-C interface for solo creators who need clean voice and instrument input.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) takes loopback (Yes) and bus powered (Yes). It gives up ADAT expansion and TRS outputs to the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen. It is the cheaper of the two, by $10.00.
Leads on
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
Bus power means the interface runs off USB alone — no wall adapter to carry or find a socket for.
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen takes ADAT expansion (Yes), TRS outputs (10, +8), XLR inputs (2, +1) and headphone outputs (2, +1). It also leads on preamp gain. It gives up loopback and bus powered to the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen). That costs $10.00 more than the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen).
Leads on
ADAT lets you add eight more inputs later instead of replacing the interface.
More TRS outputs allow routing to studio monitors and outboard gear.
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
A second headphone output lets a guest monitor without a splitter.
More gain drives quiet dynamic microphones like the SM7B without a separate booster.
These 6 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is loopback, which the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) has and the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 7 specs. They match on 6 specs, including connection type, sample rate and bit depth. Two audio interfaces from Focusrite, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Get the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen. The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen wins Mic Inputs, Monitoring and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $149.99, so the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) stays the pick if $10 matters more than those specs.
Both share 6 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), sample rate (192kHz), bit depth (24-bit) and max sample rate (192kHz), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.