Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen vs Roland BRIDGE CAST X compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs and Monitoring. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $349.01.
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen | Roland BRIDGE CAST X |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 5.8/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Power | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 3/10 |
The Split
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen takes ADAT expansion (Yes), sample rate (192kHz, +144kHz), max sample rate (192kHz, +96kHz) and XLR inputs (2, +1). It also leads on headphone outputs. It gives up loopback to the Roland BRIDGE CAST X. It is the cheaper of the two, by $349.01.
Leads on
ADAT lets you add eight more inputs later instead of replacing the interface.
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
Higher max sample rates future-proof your setup for high-resolution audio production.
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
A second headphone output lets a guest monitor without a splitter.
Streaming-focused audio interface and control hub with advanced routing for gaming and broadcast workflows.
On paper the Roland BRIDGE CAST X takes loopback (Yes). It gives up ADAT expansion and sample rate to the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen. That costs $349.01 more than the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen.
Leads on
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
These 4 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is loopback, which the Roland BRIDGE CAST X has and the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 6 specs. They match on 4 specs, including bit depth, phantom power and direct monitoring. Two audio interfaces from Focusrite and Roland, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Get the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen. The Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs and Monitoring. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $349.01.
Both share 4 specifications in the catalog, including bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes), direct monitoring (Yes) and bus powered (No). None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Roland BRIDGE CAST X costs $499.00 against $149.99, a difference of $349. The premium buys loopback (Yes). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.