Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) vs Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) vs Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen)
Focusrite
Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen)
$139.99
Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer
Audio-Technica
Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer
$199

The Ruling

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) or Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer? Get the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen), narrowly.

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) wins Audio Resolution — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $59.01.

Check price on Amazon

At a Glance

Where each one actually leads

Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.

CategoryFocusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen)Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer
Audio Resolution10/107.5/10
Mic Inputs10/1010/10
Monitoring10/1010/10
Creator Features10/1010/10
Power10/1010/10
Value10/107/10

The Split

What each one wins

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen)

Compact 1-mic USB-C interface for solo creators who need clean voice and instrument input.

On paper the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) takes sample rate (192kHz, +144kHz). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. It is the cheaper of the two, by $59.01.

Leads on

  • Sample Rate +144kHz
    192kHz
    48kHz

    Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.

Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer

Compact desktop streaming mixer/interface with tactile controls for mic and monitor balancing.

It gives up sample rate to the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen). That costs $59.01 more than the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen).

Leads on

  • Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.

Where they’re identical

These 11 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.

  • Connection Type usb-c, xlr, trs
  • Bit Depth 24-bit
  • Max Sample Rate 192kHz
  • Phantom Power Yes
  • XLR Inputs 1
  • Headphone Outputs 1
  • Direct Monitoring Yes
  • Loopback Yes
  • ADAT Expansion No
  • MIDI I/O None
  • Bus Powered Yes

The Record

19 specs, grouped by area

Full specification comparison of Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) and Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer, grouped by area.
Specification
Focusrite
Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen)
Audio-Technica
Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer
Audio ResolutionFocusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen)
Sample Rate✓ 192kHz48kHz
Max Sample Rate192kHz192kHz
Bit Depth24-bit24-bit
PreampsNot enough data
Preamp Gain57dBno data
Dynamic Range120dBno data
Mic InputsEven
XLR Inputs11
MonitoringEven
Headphone Outputs11
Direct MonitoringYesYes
Creator FeaturesEven
LoopbackYesYes
ADAT ExpansionNoNo
MIDI I/ONoneNone
Bundled SoftwareHitmaker Expansion, Ableton Live Lite, Pro Tools Intro+, Cubase LEno data
ConnectivityNot enough data
TRS Outputs2no data
Connection Typeusb-c, xlr, trsusb-c, xlr, trs
PowerEven
Bus PoweredYesYes
Phantom PowerYesYes
BuildNot enough data
Dimensions143 x 96 x 46.5 mmno data
Weight0.382 kgno data
CompatibilityNot enough data
Operating Systemno datano data

A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.

Bottom Line

Who each one is for

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.

Our pick
Best ValueMost ConnectivityPortability Pick

At $139.99, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) is the most affordable option — 30% less than the priciest pick. It leads in sample rate (192kHz). Offers the most spec advantages per dollar in this comparison.

  • + Higher sample rate (192kHz vs 48kHz)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You want 192kHz sample rate for higher-resolution audio
  • ✓ Budget is your top priority — $59.01 less than the priciest option
  • ✓ You need gear you can easily take on the go

Best for value-focused buyers, complex setup builders, mobile creators.

The alternative

At $199.00, the Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer is the most expensive option and doesn't clearly outspec the cheaper alternatives. It trades raw specs for a simpler, more focused experience. Fewer ports and inputs — plug in and go.

  • × Lower sample rate (48kHz vs 192kHz)
  • × Most expensive at $199.00

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You need gear you can easily take on the go

Look elsewhere if

  • × You're on a tight budget — save $59.01 with a cheaper option
  • × You need the highest sample rate available (192kHz)

Best for beginners.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) and Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer?

The largest gap is sample rate, where the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) leads — 192kHz against 48kHz. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 1 spec. They match on 11 specs, including connection type, bit depth and max sample rate. Two audio interfaces from Focusrite and Audio-Technica, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.

Which is better for streaming, Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) or Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer?

Get the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen), narrowly. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) wins Audio Resolution — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $59.01.

What do the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) and Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer have in common?

Both share 11 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), max sample rate (192kHz) and phantom power (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.

Is the Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer worth the extra $59 over the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen)?

The Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer costs $199.00 against $139.99, a difference of $59. On the catalog's specifications it does not lead the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) anywhere, so the premium buys brand, build or something the catalog does not record. Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.

Related Comparisons

Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) vs Arturia MiniFuse 2 Compare → Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer vs EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface Compare → Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) vs Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd Gen Compare → Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer vs M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C Compare → Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) Compare → Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer vs Mackie Onyx Artist 1x2 Compare →