Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) vs Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) wins Audio Resolution — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $59.01.
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) | Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Power | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 7/10 |
The Split
Compact 1-mic USB-C interface for solo creators who need clean voice and instrument input.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) takes sample rate (192kHz, +144kHz). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. It is the cheaper of the two, by $59.01.
Leads on
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
Compact desktop streaming mixer/interface with tactile controls for mic and monitor balancing.
It gives up sample rate to the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen). That costs $59.01 more than the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen).
Leads on
These 11 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The largest gap is sample rate, where the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) leads — 192kHz against 48kHz. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 1 spec. They match on 11 specs, including connection type, bit depth and max sample rate. Two audio interfaces from Focusrite and Audio-Technica, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Get the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen), narrowly. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) wins Audio Resolution — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $59.01.
Both share 11 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), max sample rate (192kHz) and phantom power (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer costs $199.00 against $139.99, a difference of $59. On the catalog's specifications it does not lead the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) anywhere, so the premium buys brand, build or something the catalog does not record. Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.