Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs Audient EVO 4
Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs Audient EVO 4 compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 or Audient EVO 4? Get the Audient EVO 4.
The Audient EVO 4 wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $129, so the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 stays the pick if $69.01 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 | Audient EVO 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Power | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22
Budget 2x2 USB audio interface with MIDAS mic preamp for beginner recording and streaming setups.
It gives up loopback and sample rate to the Audient EVO 4. It is the cheaper of the two, by $69.01.
Leads on
- Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.
Audient EVO 4
Compact 2-in/2-out USB-C interface with Smartgain and clean preamps for creators and podcasters.
On paper the Audient EVO 4 takes loopback (Yes), sample rate (96kHz, +48kHz) and XLR inputs (2, +1). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. That costs $69.01 more than the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22.
Leads on
-
LoopbackYesNo
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
-
Sample Rate +48kHz96kHz48kHz
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
-
XLR Inputs +121
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
Where they’re identical
These 8 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Bit Depth 24-bit
- Phantom Power Yes
- Headphone Outputs 1
- Direct Monitoring Yes
- ADAT Expansion No
- MIDI I/O None
- Bus Powered Yes
- TRS Outputs 2
The Record
19 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The Audient EVO 4 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 and Audient EVO 4?
The clearest difference is loopback, which the Audient EVO 4 has and the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 3 specs. They match on 8 specs, including bit depth, phantom power and headphone outputs. Two audio interfaces from Behringer and Audient, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Which is better for streaming, Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 or Audient EVO 4?
Get the Audient EVO 4. The Audient EVO 4 wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $129, so the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 stays the pick if $69.01 matters more than those specs.
What do the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 and Audient EVO 4 have in common?
Both share 8 specifications in the catalog, including bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes), headphone outputs (1) and direct monitoring (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
Is the Audient EVO 4 worth the extra $69 over the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22?
The Audient EVO 4 costs $129.00 against $59.99, a difference of $69. The premium buys loopback (Yes), sample rate (96kHz) and XLR inputs (2). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.