Audient EVO 4 vs M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C
Audient EVO 4 vs M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
Audient EVO 4 or M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C? Get the Audient EVO 4, narrowly.
The Audient EVO 4 wins Preamps and Creator Features — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $70.
Unless…
- You need audio resolution — get the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Audient EVO 4 | M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Preamps | 10/10 | 9.3/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
Audient EVO 4
Compact 2-in/2-out USB-C interface with Smartgain and clean preamps for creators and podcasters.
On paper the Audient EVO 4 takes loopback (Yes), dynamic range (113dB, +9dB) and preamp gain (58dB, +3dB). It gives up sample rate to the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C. It is the cheaper of the two, by $70.00.
Leads on
-
LoopbackYesNo
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
-
Dynamic Range +9dB113dB104dB
Wider converter dynamic range means less noise between the quietest and loudest parts of a take.
-
Preamp Gain +3dB58dB55dB
More gain drives quiet dynamic microphones like the SM7B without a separate booster.
M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C takes sample rate (192kHz, +96kHz). It gives up loopback and dynamic range to the Audient EVO 4. That costs $70.00 more than the Audient EVO 4.
Leads on
-
Sample Rate +96kHz192kHz96kHz
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
Where they’re identical
These 9 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Connection Type usb-c, xlr, trs
- Bit Depth 24-bit
- Phantom Power Yes
- XLR Inputs 2
- Headphone Outputs 1
- Direct Monitoring Yes
- ADAT Expansion No
- Bus Powered Yes
- TRS Outputs 2
The Record
19 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The Audient EVO 4 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Audient EVO 4 and M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C?
The clearest difference is loopback, which the Audient EVO 4 has and the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 4 specs. They match on 9 specs, including connection type, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio interfaces from Audient and M-Audio, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Which is better for streaming, Audient EVO 4 or M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C?
Get the Audient EVO 4, narrowly. The Audient EVO 4 wins Preamps and Creator Features — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $70.
What do the Audient EVO 4 and M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C have in common?
Both share 9 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and XLR inputs (2), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
Is the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C worth the extra $70 over the Audient EVO 4?
The M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C costs $199.00 against $129.00, a difference of $70. The premium buys sample rate (192kHz). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.