Audient EVO 4 vs Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Audient EVO 4 wins Preamps and Mic Inputs — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $10.99.
Unless…
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Audient EVO 4 | Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Preamps | 9.7/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
Compact 2-in/2-out USB-C interface with Smartgain and clean preamps for creators and podcasters.
On paper the Audient EVO 4 takes XLR inputs (2, +1) and preamp gain (58dB, +1dB). It gives up sample rate and dynamic range to the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen). It is the cheaper of the two, by $10.99.
Leads on
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
More gain drives quiet dynamic microphones like the SM7B without a separate booster.
Compact 1-mic USB-C interface for solo creators who need clean voice and instrument input.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) takes sample rate (192kHz, +96kHz) and dynamic range (120dB, +7dB). It gives up XLR inputs and preamp gain to the Audient EVO 4. That costs $10.99 more than the Audient EVO 4.
Leads on
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
Wider converter dynamic range means less noise between the quietest and loudest parts of a take.
These 10 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Audient EVO 4 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The largest gap is sample rate, where the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) leads — 192kHz against 96kHz. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 4 specs. They match on 10 specs, including connection type, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio interfaces from Audient and Focusrite, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Get the Audient EVO 4, narrowly. The Audient EVO 4 wins Preamps and Mic Inputs — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $10.99.
Both share 10 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and headphone outputs (1), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) costs $139.99 against $129.00, a difference of $11. The premium buys sample rate (192kHz) and dynamic range (120dB). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.