Audient EVO 4 vs Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer
Audient EVO 4 vs Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
Audient EVO 4 or Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer? Get the Audient EVO 4.
The Audient EVO 4 wins Audio Resolution and Mic Inputs. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $70.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Audient EVO 4 | Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Power | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 6.5/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
Audient EVO 4
Compact 2-in/2-out USB-C interface with Smartgain and clean preamps for creators and podcasters.
On paper the Audient EVO 4 takes sample rate (96kHz, +48kHz) and XLR inputs (2, +1). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. It is the cheaper of the two, by $70.00.
Leads on
-
Sample Rate +48kHz96kHz48kHz
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
-
XLR Inputs +121
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer
Compact desktop streaming mixer/interface with tactile controls for mic and monitor balancing.
It gives up sample rate and XLR inputs to the Audient EVO 4. That costs $70.00 more than the Audient EVO 4.
Leads on
- Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.
Where they’re identical
These 9 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Connection Type usb-c, xlr, trs
- Bit Depth 24-bit
- Phantom Power Yes
- Headphone Outputs 1
- Direct Monitoring Yes
- Loopback Yes
- ADAT Expansion No
- MIDI I/O None
- Bus Powered Yes
The Record
19 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The Audient EVO 4 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Audient EVO 4 and Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer?
The largest gap is sample rate, where the Audient EVO 4 leads — 96kHz against 48kHz. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 2 specs. They match on 9 specs, including connection type, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio interfaces from Audient and Audio-Technica, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Which is better for streaming, Audient EVO 4 or Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer?
Get the Audient EVO 4. The Audient EVO 4 wins Audio Resolution and Mic Inputs. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $70.
What do the Audient EVO 4 and Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer have in common?
Both share 9 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and headphone outputs (1), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
Is the Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer worth the extra $70 over the Audient EVO 4?
The Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer costs $199.00 against $129.00, a difference of $70. On the catalog's specifications it does not lead the Audient EVO 4 anywhere, so the premium buys brand, build or something the catalog does not record. Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.