Audient EVO 4 vs Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the Audient EVO 4 takes Mic Inputs, the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface takes Audio Resolution. With the trade even, $70 is the tiebreaker, and the Audient EVO 4 is the cheaper side of it.
Unless…
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Audient EVO 4 | Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Power | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
Compact 2-in/2-out USB-C interface with Smartgain and clean preamps for creators and podcasters.
On paper the Audient EVO 4 takes XLR inputs (2, +1). It gives up sample rate to the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface. It is the cheaper of the two, by $70.00.
Leads on
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface takes sample rate (192kHz, +96kHz). It gives up XLR inputs to the Audient EVO 4. That costs $70.00 more than the Audient EVO 4.
Leads on
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
These 10 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Audient EVO 4 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The largest gap is sample rate, where the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface leads — 192kHz against 96kHz. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 2 specs. They match on 10 specs, including connection type, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio interfaces from Audient and Steinberg, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
It is a toss-up — take the Audient EVO 4. Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the Audient EVO 4 takes Mic Inputs, the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface takes Audio Resolution. With the trade even, $70 is the tiebreaker, and the Audient EVO 4 is the cheaper side of it.
Both share 10 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and headphone outputs (1), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface costs $199.00 against $129.00, a difference of $70. The premium buys sample rate (192kHz). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.