Audient EVO 4 vs Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface

Audient EVO 4 vs Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.

Audient EVO 4
Audient
Audient EVO 4
$129
Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface
Steinberg
Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface
$199

The Ruling

Audient EVO 4 or Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface? It is a toss-up — take the Audient EVO 4.

Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the Audient EVO 4 takes Mic Inputs, the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface takes Audio Resolution. With the trade even, $70 is the tiebreaker, and the Audient EVO 4 is the cheaper side of it.

Check price on Amazon

Unless…

At a Glance

Where each one actually leads

Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.

CategoryAudient EVO 4Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface
Audio Resolution7.5/1010/10
Mic Inputs10/105/10
Monitoring10/1010/10
Creator Features10/1010/10
Connectivity10/1010/10
Power10/1010/10

The Split

What each one wins

Audient EVO 4

Compact 2-in/2-out USB-C interface with Smartgain and clean preamps for creators and podcasters.

On paper the Audient EVO 4 takes XLR inputs (2, +1). It gives up sample rate to the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface. It is the cheaper of the two, by $70.00.

Leads on

  • XLR Inputs +1
    2
    1

    More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.

Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface

Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.

On paper the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface takes sample rate (192kHz, +96kHz). It gives up XLR inputs to the Audient EVO 4. That costs $70.00 more than the Audient EVO 4.

Leads on

  • Sample Rate +96kHz
    192kHz
    96kHz

    Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.

Where they’re identical

These 10 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.

  • Connection Type usb-c, xlr, trs
  • Bit Depth 24-bit
  • Phantom Power Yes
  • Headphone Outputs 1
  • Direct Monitoring Yes
  • Loopback Yes
  • ADAT Expansion No
  • MIDI I/O None
  • Bus Powered Yes
  • TRS Outputs 2

The Record

19 specs, grouped by area

Full specification comparison of Audient EVO 4 and Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface, grouped by area.
Specification
Audient
Audient EVO 4
Steinberg
Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface
Audio ResolutionSteinberg UR12C Audio Interface
Sample Rate96kHz✓ 192kHz
Max Sample Rateno datano data
Bit Depth24-bit24-bit
PreampsNot enough data
Preamp Gain58dBno data
Dynamic Range113dBno data
Mic InputsAudient EVO 4
XLR Inputs✓ 21
MonitoringEven
Headphone Outputs11
Direct MonitoringYesYes
Creator FeaturesEven
LoopbackYesYes
ADAT ExpansionNoNo
MIDI I/ONoneNone
Bundled Softwareno datano data
ConnectivityEven
TRS Outputs22
Connection Typeusb-c, xlr, trsusb-c, xlr, trs
PowerEven
Bus PoweredYesYes
Phantom PowerYesYes
BuildNot enough data
Dimensions140 x 60 x 55 mmno data
Weight0.36 kgno data
CompatibilityNot enough data
Operating Systemno datawindows, macos

A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.

Bottom Line

Who each one is for

The Audient EVO 4 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.

Our pick
Best ValueMost ConnectivityBest for Multi-micPortability Pick

At $129.00, the Audient EVO 4 is the most affordable option — 35% less than the priciest pick. It leads in XLR inputs (2). Offers the most spec advantages per dollar in this comparison.

  • + More XLR inputs (2 vs 1)
  • × Lower sample rate (96kHz vs 192kHz)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You need 2 XLR inputs for recording multiple sources
  • ✓ Budget is your top priority — $70.00 less than the priciest option
  • ✓ You need gear you can easily take on the go

Look elsewhere if

  • × You need the highest sample rate available (192kHz)

Best for value-focused buyers, complex setup builders, multi-person podcasts.

The alternative
Easiest Setup

At $199.00, the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface is the priciest option — a premium pick if brand, build, or specific features matter to you. It leads in sample rate (192kHz). Fewer ports and inputs — plug in and go.

  • + Higher sample rate (192kHz vs 96kHz)
  • × Fewer XLR inputs (1 vs 2)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You want 192kHz sample rate for higher-resolution audio

Look elsewhere if

  • × You're on a tight budget — save $70.00 with a cheaper option
  • × You plan to record multiple microphones simultaneously

Best for beginners, high-resolution audio production.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Audient EVO 4 and Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface?

The largest gap is sample rate, where the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface leads — 192kHz against 96kHz. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 2 specs. They match on 10 specs, including connection type, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio interfaces from Audient and Steinberg, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.

Which is better for streaming, Audient EVO 4 or Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface?

It is a toss-up — take the Audient EVO 4. Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the Audient EVO 4 takes Mic Inputs, the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface takes Audio Resolution. With the trade even, $70 is the tiebreaker, and the Audient EVO 4 is the cheaper side of it.

What do the Audient EVO 4 and Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface have in common?

Both share 10 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and headphone outputs (1), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.

Is the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface worth the extra $70 over the Audient EVO 4?

The Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface costs $199.00 against $129.00, a difference of $70. The premium buys sample rate (192kHz). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.

Related Comparisons

Audient EVO 4 vs Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface Compare → Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface vs Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer Compare → Audient EVO 4 vs NearStream USB Audio Interface Compare → Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface vs EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface Compare → Audient EVO 4 vs Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) Compare → Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface vs M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C Compare →