Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) vs Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) takes Mic Inputs, the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface takes Creator Features. With the trade even, $49.01 is the tiebreaker, and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) is the cheaper side of it.
Unless…
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) | Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Power | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
Popular 2-in/2-out USB audio interface with low-noise preamps and direct monitoring.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) takes XLR inputs (2, +1). It gives up loopback to the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface. It is the cheaper of the two, by $49.01.
Leads on
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface takes loopback (Yes). It gives up XLR inputs to the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen). That costs $49.01 more than the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen).
Leads on
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
These 10 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is loopback, which the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface has and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 2 specs. They match on 10 specs, including connection type, sample rate and bit depth. Two audio interfaces from Focusrite and Steinberg, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
It is a toss-up — take the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen). Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) takes Mic Inputs, the Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface takes Creator Features. With the trade even, $49.01 is the tiebreaker, and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) is the cheaper side of it.
Both share 10 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), sample rate (192kHz), bit depth (24-bit) and phantom power (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Steinberg UR12C Audio Interface costs $199.00 against $149.99, a difference of $49. The premium buys loopback (Yes). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.