Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs BEACN Studio Audio Interface
Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs BEACN Studio Audio Interface compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 or BEACN Studio Audio Interface? Get the BEACN Studio Audio Interface.
The BEACN Studio Audio Interface wins Mic Inputs and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $249, so the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 stays the pick if $189.01 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 | BEACN Studio Audio Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Power | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 2.4/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22
Budget 2x2 USB audio interface with MIDAS mic preamp for beginner recording and streaming setups.
It gives up loopback and XLR inputs to the BEACN Studio Audio Interface. It is the cheaper of the two, by $189.01.
Leads on
- Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.
BEACN Studio Audio Interface
Streaming-focused audio interface with creator routing, clean preamps, and low-latency monitoring.
On paper the BEACN Studio Audio Interface takes loopback (Yes) and XLR inputs (2, +1). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. That costs $189.01 more than the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22.
Leads on
-
LoopbackYesNo
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
-
XLR Inputs +121
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
Where they’re identical
These 8 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Sample Rate 48kHz
- Bit Depth 24-bit
- Phantom Power Yes
- Headphone Outputs 1
- Direct Monitoring Yes
- ADAT Expansion No
- MIDI I/O None
- Bus Powered Yes
The Record
19 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The BEACN Studio Audio Interface is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 and BEACN Studio Audio Interface?
The clearest difference is loopback, which the BEACN Studio Audio Interface has and the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 2 specs. They match on 8 specs, including sample rate, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio interfaces from Behringer and BEACN, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Which is better for streaming, Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 or BEACN Studio Audio Interface?
Get the BEACN Studio Audio Interface. The BEACN Studio Audio Interface wins Mic Inputs and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $249, so the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 stays the pick if $189.01 matters more than those specs.
What do the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 and BEACN Studio Audio Interface have in common?
Both share 8 specifications in the catalog, including sample rate (48kHz), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and headphone outputs (1), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
Is the BEACN Studio Audio Interface worth the extra $189 over the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22?
The BEACN Studio Audio Interface costs $249.00 against $59.99, a difference of $189. The premium buys loopback (Yes) and XLR inputs (2). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.