Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs, Monitoring, Creator Features and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $129, so the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 stays the pick if $69.01 matters more than those specs.
Unless…
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 | Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 0/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 2.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Power | 10/10 | 0/10 |
The Split
Budget 2x2 USB audio interface with MIDAS mic preamp for beginner recording and streaming setups.
On paper the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 takes bus powered (Yes). It gives up loopback and ADAT expansion to the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface. It is the cheaper of the two, by $69.01.
Leads on
Bus power means the interface runs off USB alone — no wall adapter to carry or find a socket for.
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface takes loopback (Yes), ADAT expansion (Yes), TRS outputs (8, +6) and sample rate (96kHz, +48kHz). It also leads on XLR inputs and headphone outputs. It gives up bus powered to the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22. That costs $69.01 more than the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22.
Leads on
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
ADAT lets you add eight more inputs later instead of replacing the interface.
More TRS outputs allow routing to studio monitors and outboard gear.
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
A second headphone output lets a guest monitor without a splitter.
These 4 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is loopback, which the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface has and the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 7 specs. They match on 4 specs, including bit depth, phantom power and direct monitoring. Two audio interfaces from Behringer and Audient, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Get the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface. The Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs, Monitoring, Creator Features and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $129, so the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 stays the pick if $69.01 matters more than those specs.
Both share 4 specifications in the catalog, including bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes), direct monitoring (Yes) and MIDI I/O (None). None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface costs $129.00 against $59.99, a difference of $69. The premium buys loopback (Yes), ADAT expansion (Yes) and TRS outputs (8). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.