Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface

Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.

Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22
Behringer
Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22
$59.99
Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface
Audient
Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface
$129

The Ruling

Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 or Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface? Get the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface.

The Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs, Monitoring, Creator Features and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $129, so the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 stays the pick if $69.01 matters more than those specs.

Check price on Amazon

Unless…

At a Glance

Where each one actually leads

Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.

CategoryBehringer U-PHORIA UMC22Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface
Audio Resolution7.5/1010/10
Mic Inputs5/1010/10
Monitoring7.5/1010/10
Creator Features0/1010/10
Connectivity2.5/1010/10
Power10/100/10

The Split

What each one wins

Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22

Budget 2x2 USB audio interface with MIDAS mic preamp for beginner recording and streaming setups.

On paper the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 takes bus powered (Yes). It gives up loopback and ADAT expansion to the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface. It is the cheaper of the two, by $69.01.

Leads on

  • Bus Powered
    Yes
    No

    Bus power means the interface runs off USB alone — no wall adapter to carry or find a socket for.

Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface

Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.

On paper the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface takes loopback (Yes), ADAT expansion (Yes), TRS outputs (8, +6) and sample rate (96kHz, +48kHz). It also leads on XLR inputs and headphone outputs. It gives up bus powered to the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22. That costs $69.01 more than the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22.

Leads on

  • Loopback
    Yes
    No

    Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.

  • ADAT Expansion
    Yes
    No

    ADAT lets you add eight more inputs later instead of replacing the interface.

  • TRS Outputs +6
    8
    2

    More TRS outputs allow routing to studio monitors and outboard gear.

  • Sample Rate +48kHz
    96kHz
    48kHz

    Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.

  • XLR Inputs +1
    2
    1

    More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.

  • Headphone Outputs +1
    2
    1

    A second headphone output lets a guest monitor without a splitter.

Where they’re identical

These 4 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.

  • Bit Depth 24-bit
  • Phantom Power Yes
  • Direct Monitoring Yes
  • MIDI I/O None

The Record

19 specs, grouped by area

Full specification comparison of Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 and Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface, grouped by area.
Specification
Behringer
Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22
Audient
Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface
Audio ResolutionAudient EVO 16 Audio Interface
Sample Rate48kHz✓ 96kHz
Max Sample Rateno datano data
Bit Depth24-bit24-bit
PreampsNot enough data
Preamp Gainno data58dB
Dynamic Rangeno data121dB
Mic InputsAudient EVO 16 Audio Interface
XLR Inputs1✓ 2
MonitoringAudient EVO 16 Audio Interface
Headphone Outputs1✓ 2
Direct MonitoringYesYes
Creator FeaturesAudient EVO 16 Audio Interface
LoopbackNo✓ Yes
ADAT ExpansionNo✓ Yes
MIDI I/ONoneNone
Bundled Softwareno datano data
ConnectivityAudient EVO 16 Audio Interface
TRS Outputs2✓ 8
Connection Typeusb-b, xlr, trsusb-c, xlr, trs
PowerBehringer U-PHORIA UMC22
Bus Powered✓ YesNo
Phantom PowerYesYes
BuildNot enough data
Dimensionsno datano data
Weightno datano data
CompatibilityNot enough data
Operating Systemno datawindows, macos

A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.

Bottom Line

Who each one is for

The Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.

The alternative
Budget Pick

At $59.99, the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 is the most affordable option — 53% less than the priciest pick. It leads in bus powered (Yes). Covers the essentials without stretching your budget.

  • + Better bus powered (Yes vs No)
  • + Exclusive connectivity: USB-B
  • × Lower sample rate (48kHz vs 96kHz)
  • × Fewer XLR inputs (1 vs 2)
  • × Fewer headphone outputs (1 vs 2)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You want the stronger bus powered (Yes)
  • ✓ Budget is your top priority — $69.01 less than the priciest option
  • ✓ You want it to run off USB alone, with no power adapter to carry

Look elsewhere if

  • × You need the highest sample rate available (96kHz)
  • × You plan to record multiple microphones simultaneously

Best for budget-conscious creators.

Our pick
Best ValuePremium PickMost ConnectivityBest for Multi-mic

The Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface is the priciest at $129.00, but leads on specs where it counts. It leads in sample rate (96kHz) and XLR inputs (2). Offers the most spec advantages per dollar in this comparison.

  • + Higher sample rate (96kHz vs 48kHz)
  • + More XLR inputs (2 vs 1)
  • + More headphone outputs (2 vs 1)
  • + Better loopback (Yes vs No)
  • + Exclusive connectivity: USB-C
  • × Weaker bus powered (No vs Yes)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You want 96kHz sample rate for higher-resolution audio
  • ✓ You need 2 XLR inputs for recording multiple sources
  • ✓ You want USB-C for a modern, reversible connector
  • ✓ You want to capture computer audio without a second interface

Look elsewhere if

  • × You need the best bus powered available

Best for value-focused buyers, professionals who want the best, complex setup builders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 and Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface?

The clearest difference is loopback, which the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface has and the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 7 specs. They match on 4 specs, including bit depth, phantom power and direct monitoring. Two audio interfaces from Behringer and Audient, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.

Which is better for streaming, Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 or Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface?

Get the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface. The Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs, Monitoring, Creator Features and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $129, so the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 stays the pick if $69.01 matters more than those specs.

What do the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 and Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface have in common?

Both share 4 specifications in the catalog, including bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes), direct monitoring (Yes) and MIDI I/O (None). None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.

Is the Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface worth the extra $69 over the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22?

The Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface costs $129.00 against $59.99, a difference of $69. The premium buys loopback (Yes), ADAT expansion (Yes) and TRS outputs (8). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.

Related Comparisons

Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs Y.D.F AR001 USB Audio Interface Compare → Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface vs Audient EVO 4 Compare → Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs Synido Live Solo MK2 Audio Interface Compare → Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface vs NearStream USB Audio Interface Compare → Behringer U-PHORIA UMC22 vs Audient EVO 4 Compare → Audient EVO 16 Audio Interface vs Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) Compare →