Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface vs M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C
Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface vs M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface or M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C? Get the Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface, narrowly.
The Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface wins Connectivity — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $10.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface | M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Preamps | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 5/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface takes TRS outputs (4, +2). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. It is the cheaper of the two, by $10.00.
Leads on
-
TRS Outputs +242
More TRS outputs allow routing to studio monitors and outboard gear.
M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
It gives up TRS outputs to the Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface. That costs $10.00 more than the Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface.
Leads on
- Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.
Where they’re identical
These 14 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Connection Type usb-c, xlr, trs
- Operating System windows, macos
- Sample Rate 192kHz
- Bit Depth 24-bit
- Max Sample Rate 192kHz
- Preamp Gain 55dB
- Phantom Power Yes
- XLR Inputs 2
- Headphone Outputs 1
- Direct Monitoring Yes
- Loopback No
- ADAT Expansion No
- MIDI I/O In/Out
- Bus Powered Yes
The Record
19 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface and M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C?
The largest gap is TRS outputs, where the Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface leads — 4 against 2. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 1 spec. They match on 14 specs, including connection type, operating system and sample rate. Two audio interfaces from Universal Audio and M-Audio, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Which is better for streaming, Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface or M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C?
Get the Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface, narrowly. The Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface wins Connectivity — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $10.
What do the Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface and M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C have in common?
Both share 14 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), operating system (windows, macos), sample rate (192kHz) and bit depth (24-bit), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.