Universal Audio Volt 2 vs EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface
Universal Audio Volt 2 vs EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
Universal Audio Volt 2 or EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface? Get the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface.
The EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface wins Preamps, Monitoring, Creator Features and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $199, so the Universal Audio Volt 2 stays the pick if $10 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Universal Audio Volt 2 | EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Preamps | 8.2/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 5/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
Universal Audio Volt 2
2-in/2-out USB audio interface with high-quality preamps and analog-inspired tone shaping.
It gives up loopback and headphone outputs to the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface. It is the cheaper of the two, by $10.00.
Leads on
- Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.
EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface takes loopback (Yes), headphone outputs (2, +1), TRS outputs (4, +2) and preamp gain (58dB, +3dB). It also leads on dynamic range. It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. That costs $10.00 more than the Universal Audio Volt 2.
Leads on
-
LoopbackYesNo
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
-
Headphone Outputs +121
A second headphone output lets a guest monitor without a splitter.
-
TRS Outputs +242
More TRS outputs allow routing to studio monitors and outboard gear.
-
Preamp Gain +3dB58dB55dB
More gain drives quiet dynamic microphones like the SM7B without a separate booster.
-
Dynamic Range +1dB113dB112dB
Wider converter dynamic range means less noise between the quietest and loudest parts of a take.
Where they’re identical
These 8 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Connection Type usb-c, xlr, trs
- Sample Rate 192kHz
- Bit Depth 24-bit
- Phantom Power Yes
- XLR Inputs 2
- Direct Monitoring Yes
- ADAT Expansion No
- Bus Powered Yes
The Record
19 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Universal Audio Volt 2 and EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface?
The clearest difference is loopback, which the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface has and the Universal Audio Volt 2 does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 5 specs. They match on 8 specs, including connection type, sample rate and bit depth. Two audio interfaces from Universal Audio and Evo, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Which is better for streaming, Universal Audio Volt 2 or EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface?
Get the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface. The EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface wins Preamps, Monitoring, Creator Features and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $199, so the Universal Audio Volt 2 stays the pick if $10 matters more than those specs.
What do the Universal Audio Volt 2 and EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface have in common?
Both share 8 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), sample rate (192kHz), bit depth (24-bit) and phantom power (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.