PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 vs M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C: Evenly matched, take the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Nothing on the chart above separates them: on every...
The Ruling
Nothing on the chart above separates them: on every axis the catalog can score, the two land close enough that calling a winner would be reading noise. With the specs level, $119.01 is the real difference, and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 is the cheaper side of it.
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 | M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Preamps | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 takes dynamic range (105dB, +1dB). It gives up preamp gain to the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C. It is the cheaper of the two, by $119.01.
Leads on
Wider converter dynamic range means less noise between the quietest and loudest parts of a take.
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C takes preamp gain (55dB, +20dB). It gives up dynamic range to the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. That costs $119.01 more than the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96.
Leads on
More gain drives quiet dynamic microphones like the SM7B without a separate booster.
These 12 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The largest gap is preamp gain, where the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C leads — 55dB against 35dB. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 2 specs. They match on 12 specs, including operating system, sample rate and bit depth. Two audio interfaces from PreSonus and M-Audio, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Evenly matched — take the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96. Nothing on the chart above separates them: on every axis the catalog can score, the two land close enough that calling a winner would be reading noise. With the specs level, $119.01 is the real difference, and the PreSonus AudioBox USB 96 is the cheaper side of it.
Both share 12 specifications in the catalog, including operating system (windows, macos), sample rate (192kHz), bit depth (24-bit) and phantom power (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C costs $199.00 against $79.99, a difference of $119. The premium buys preamp gain (55dB). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.