M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)
M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C vs Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C or Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)? Get the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen).
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) wins Preamps and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $199.99, so the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C stays the pick if $0.99 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C | Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Preamps | 8.3/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
It gives up loopback and preamp gain to the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen). The two are priced the same, so price does not decide it.
Leads on
- Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)
Two-channel USB-C audio interface with studio-grade preamps for recording, streaming, and vocals.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) takes loopback (Yes), preamp gain (69dB, +14dB) and dynamic range (120dB, +16dB). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. The two are priced the same, so price does not decide it.
Leads on
-
LoopbackYesNo
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
-
Preamp Gain +14dB69dB55dB
More gain drives quiet dynamic microphones like the SM7B without a separate booster.
-
Dynamic Range +16dB120dB104dB
Wider converter dynamic range means less noise between the quietest and loudest parts of a take.
Where they’re identical
These 11 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Connection Type usb-c, xlr, trs
- Sample Rate 192kHz
- Bit Depth 24-bit
- Max Sample Rate 192kHz
- Phantom Power Yes
- XLR Inputs 2
- Headphone Outputs 1
- Direct Monitoring Yes
- ADAT Expansion No
- Bus Powered Yes
- TRS Outputs 2
The Record
19 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C and Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)?
The clearest difference is loopback, which the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) has and the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 3 specs. They match on 11 specs, including connection type, sample rate and bit depth. Two audio interfaces from M-Audio and Focusrite, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Which is better for streaming, M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C or Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen)?
Get the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen). The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) wins Preamps and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $199.99, so the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C stays the pick if $0.99 matters more than those specs.
What do the M-Audio M-Track 2x2M-C and Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (4th Gen) have in common?
Both share 11 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), sample rate (192kHz), bit depth (24-bit) and max sample rate (192kHz), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.