Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) vs Audient iD24 compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Audient iD24 wins Preamps, Monitoring, Creator Features and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $399, so the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) stays the pick if $249.01 matters more than those specs.
Unless…
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) | Audient iD24 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Preamps | 8.7/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 0/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 5/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
Popular 2-in/2-out USB audio interface with low-noise preamps and direct monitoring.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) takes sample rate (192kHz, +96kHz). It gives up loopback and ADAT expansion to the Audient iD24. It is the cheaper of the two, by $249.01.
Leads on
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
Pro-level USB-C audio interface with strong preamps, monitor control, and expandable I/O.
On paper the Audient iD24 takes loopback (Yes), ADAT expansion (Yes), headphone outputs (2, +1) and TRS outputs (4, +2). It also leads on preamp gain and dynamic range. It gives up sample rate to the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen). That costs $249.01 more than the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen).
Leads on
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
ADAT lets you add eight more inputs later instead of replacing the interface.
A second headphone output lets a guest monitor without a splitter.
More TRS outputs allow routing to studio monitors and outboard gear.
More gain drives quiet dynamic microphones like the SM7B without a separate booster.
Wider converter dynamic range means less noise between the quietest and loudest parts of a take.
These 7 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Audient iD24 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is loopback, which the Audient iD24 has and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 7 specs. They match on 7 specs, including connection type, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio interfaces from Focusrite and Audient, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Get the Audient iD24. The Audient iD24 wins Preamps, Monitoring, Creator Features and Connectivity. It is the pricier of the two at $399, so the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) stays the pick if $249.01 matters more than those specs.
Both share 7 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and XLR inputs (2), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Audient iD24 costs $399.00 against $149.99, a difference of $249. The premium buys loopback (Yes), ADAT expansion (Yes) and headphone outputs (2). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.