Get the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface. The EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface wins Monitoring and Creator Features. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $74.01.
The Ruling
The EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface wins Monitoring and Creator Features. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $74.01.
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface | Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Preamps | 10/10 | 9.5/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Creator Features | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
On paper the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface takes loopback (Yes), headphone outputs (2, +1) and preamp gain (58dB, +3dB). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. It is the cheaper of the two, by $74.01.
Leads on
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
A second headphone output lets a guest monitor without a splitter.
More gain drives quiet dynamic microphones like the SM7B without a separate booster.
Desktop audio interface intended for creator workflows, microphone input, monitoring, and clean signal routing.
It gives up loopback and headphone outputs to the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface. That costs $74.01 more than the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface.
Leads on
These 10 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is loopback, which the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface has and the Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 3 specs. They match on 10 specs, including connection type, operating system and sample rate. Two audio interfaces from Evo and Universal Audio, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Get the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface. The EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface wins Monitoring and Creator Features. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $74.01.
Both share 10 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), operating system (windows, macos), sample rate (192kHz) and bit depth (24-bit), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Universal Audio Volt 276 USB-C Interface costs $374.00 against $299.99, a difference of $74. On the catalog's specifications it does not lead the EVO 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface anywhere, so the premium buys brand, build or something the catalog does not record. Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.