Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer vs Audient iD24 compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Audient iD24 wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $399, so the Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer stays the pick if $200 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer | Audient iD24 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 7.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Power | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 5/10 |
The Split
Compact desktop streaming mixer/interface with tactile controls for mic and monitor balancing.
It gives up ADAT expansion and sample rate to the Audient iD24. It is the cheaper of the two, by $200.00.
Leads on
Pro-level USB-C audio interface with strong preamps, monitor control, and expandable I/O.
On paper the Audient iD24 takes ADAT expansion (Yes), sample rate (96kHz, +48kHz), XLR inputs (2, +1) and headphone outputs (2, +1). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. That costs $200.00 more than the Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer.
Leads on
ADAT lets you add eight more inputs later instead of replacing the interface.
Higher sample rates capture more audio detail — important for professional recording and mixing.
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
A second headphone output lets a guest monitor without a splitter.
These 7 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Audient iD24 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is ADAT expansion, which the Audient iD24 has and the Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 4 specs. They match on 7 specs, including connection type, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio interfaces from Audio-Technica and Audient, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Get the Audient iD24. The Audient iD24 wins Audio Resolution, Mic Inputs, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $399, so the Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 Desktop Mixer stays the pick if $200 matters more than those specs.
Both share 7 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and direct monitoring (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Audient iD24 costs $399.00 against $199.00, a difference of $200. The premium buys ADAT expansion (Yes), sample rate (96kHz) and XLR inputs (2). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.