UGREEN USB-C to HDMI Adapter 4K60 vs UGREEN USB-C to HDMI 2.1 Adapter compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
On every spec the catalog holds for both of these, they match. With nothing to separate them on paper, $8 is the only real difference, and the UGREEN USB-C to HDMI Adapter 4K60 is the cheaper side of it.
The Split
Simple USB-C to HDMI adapter for routing video to monitors or capture devices.
It is the cheaper of the two, by $8.00.
Leads on
USB-C to HDMI 2.1 adapter for high refresh rate and higher bandwidth display links.
That costs $8.00 more than the UGREEN USB-C to HDMI Adapter 4K60.
Leads on
One spec is the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The UGREEN USB-C to HDMI Adapter 4K60 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
On the specifications the catalog records, these two are near-identical: they match on 1 spec and nothing measurably separates them. Two cables and adapters from UGREEN, each taking a different approach to compatibility and signal quality.
Too close to call — take the UGREEN USB-C to HDMI Adapter 4K60. On every spec the catalog holds for both of these, they match. With nothing to separate them on paper, $8 is the only real difference, and the UGREEN USB-C to HDMI Adapter 4K60 is the cheaper side of it.