Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser vs Lewitt Ray Dynamic Streaming Microphone
Get the Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser. The Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser wins Low-End Reach and High-End Reach. It is also the cheaper of the...
The Ruling
Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser or Lewitt Ray Dynamic Streaming Microphone? Get the Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser.
The Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser wins Low-End Reach and High-End Reach. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $180.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser | Lewitt Ray Dynamic Streaming Microphone |
|---|---|---|
| Low-End Reach | 10/10 | 7.7/10 |
| High-End Reach | 10/10 | 9.3/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 4.8/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser
Broadcast-style microphone designed for vocal capture, podcasting, and treated streaming setups.
On paper the Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser takes frequency response (20Hz-20kHz). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. It is the cheaper of the two, by $180.00.
Leads on
-
Frequency Response20Hz-20kHz50Hz-16kHz
Wider frequency response captures more of the audible spectrum, from deep bass to airy highs.
Lewitt Ray Dynamic Streaming Microphone
Broadcast-style microphone designed for vocal capture, podcasting, and treated streaming setups.
It gives up frequency response to the Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser. That costs $180.00 more than the Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser.
Leads on
- Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.
Where they’re identical
These 2 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Connection Type xlr
- Polar Pattern Cardioid
The Record
9 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser and Lewitt Ray Dynamic Streaming Microphone?
The largest gap is frequency response, where the Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser leads — 20Hz-20kHz against 50Hz-16kHz. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 1 spec. They match on 2 specs, including connection type and polar pattern. Two microphones from Rode and Lewitt, each taking a different approach to sound character and pickup pattern.
Which is better for streaming, Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser or Lewitt Ray Dynamic Streaming Microphone?
Get the Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser. The Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser wins Low-End Reach and High-End Reach. It is also the cheaper of the two, by $180.
Is the Lewitt Ray Dynamic Streaming Microphone worth the extra $180 over the Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser?
The Lewitt Ray Dynamic Streaming Microphone costs $349.00 against $169.00, a difference of $180. On the catalog's specifications it does not lead the Rode NT1-A Large-diaphragm Condenser anywhere, so the premium buys brand, build or something the catalog does not record. Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.