Mackie ProFX6v3+ vs Rode RODECaster Pro II

Mackie ProFX6v3+ vs Rode RODECaster Pro II compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.

Mackie ProFX6v3+
Mackie
Mackie ProFX6v3+
$229
Rode RODECaster Pro II
Rode
Rode RODECaster Pro II
$699

The Ruling

Mackie ProFX6v3+ or Rode RODECaster Pro II? Get the Rode RODECaster Pro II.

The Rode RODECaster Pro II wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $699, so the Mackie ProFX6v3+ stays the pick if $470 matters more than those specs.

Check price on Amazon

Unless…

At a Glance

Where each one actually leads

Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.

CategoryMackie ProFX6v3+Rode RODECaster Pro II
Audio Resolution10/106.3/10
Channels5/1010/10
Monitoring2.5/1010/10
Creator Features6.7/1010/10
Value10/103.3/10

The Split

What each one wins

Mackie ProFX6v3+

Creator mixer with Onyx preamps and USB interface features for streaming and recording.

On paper the Mackie ProFX6v3+ takes sample rate (192kHz, +144kHz). It gives up records to SD card and headphone outputs to the Rode RODECaster Pro II. It is the cheaper of the two, by $470.00.

Leads on

  • Sample Rate +144kHz
    192kHz
    48kHz

    Higher sample rate processing preserves audio fidelity through the mixer.

Rode RODECaster Pro II

Flagship production mixer/interface with extensive routing, processing, and multi-source creator workflows.

On paper the Rode RODECaster Pro II takes records to SD card (Yes), headphone outputs (4, +3) and XLR inputs (4, +2). It gives up sample rate to the Mackie ProFX6v3+. That costs $470.00 more than the Mackie ProFX6v3+.

Leads on

  • Records to SD Card
    Yes
    No

    Recording to an SD card gives you a backup take that survives a computer crash.

  • Headphone Outputs +3
    4
    1

    More headphone outputs mean more guests can monitor without splitters.

  • XLR Inputs +2
    4
    2

    More XLR inputs mean you can connect more microphones at once.

Where they’re identical

These 5 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.

  • Connection Type usb-c, xlr, trs
  • Bit Depth 24-bit
  • Phantom Power Yes
  • Onboard Effects Yes
  • Bluetooth Yes

The Record

22 specs, grouped by area

Full specification comparison of Mackie ProFX6v3+ and Rode RODECaster Pro II, grouped by area.
Specification
Mackie
Mackie ProFX6v3+
Rode
Rode RODECaster Pro II
Audio ResolutionMackie ProFX6v3+
Sample Rate✓ 192kHz48kHz
Max Sample Rate192kHzno data
Bit Depth24-bit24-bit
PreampsNot enough data
Preamp Gainno data76dB
ChannelsRode RODECaster Pro II
XLR Inputs2✓ 4
XLR Outputsno datano data
MonitoringRode RODECaster Pro II
Headphone Outputs1✓ 4
RoutingNot enough data
Fadersno data6
Aux Sendsno datano data
Bus Outputsno datano data
USB Audio Channels4no data
Creator FeaturesRode RODECaster Pro II
Onboard EffectsYesYes
Sound Padsno data8
BluetoothYesYes
Records to SD CardNo✓ Yes
ConnectivityNot enough data
TRS Outputsno datano data
Connection Typeusb-c, xlr, trsusb-c, xlr, trs
PowerNot enough data
Phantom PowerYesYes
BuildNot enough data
Dimensionsno datano data
Weightno datano data
CompatibilityNot enough data
Operating Systemno datawindows, macos
Other specsNot enough data
Controlsno datano data

A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.

Bottom Line

Who each one is for

The Rode RODECaster Pro II is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.

The alternative
Budget Pick

At $229.00, the Mackie ProFX6v3+ is the most affordable option — 67% less than the priciest pick. It leads in sample rate (192kHz). Covers the essentials without stretching your budget.

  • + Higher sample rate (192kHz vs 48kHz)
  • × Fewer XLR inputs (2 vs 4)
  • × Fewer headphone outputs (1 vs 4)
  • × Weaker records to SD card (No vs Yes)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You want 192kHz sample rate for higher-resolution audio
  • ✓ Budget is your top priority — $470.00 less than the priciest option

Look elsewhere if

  • × You plan to record multiple microphones simultaneously
  • × You need the best headphone outputs available

Best for budget-conscious creators, high-resolution audio production.

Our pick
Best ValuePremium PickMost ConnectivityBest for Multi-mic

The Rode RODECaster Pro II is the priciest at $699.00, but leads on specs where it counts. It leads in XLR inputs (4) and headphone outputs (4). Offers the most spec advantages per dollar in this comparison.

  • + More XLR inputs (4 vs 2)
  • + More headphone outputs (4 vs 1)
  • + Better records to SD card (Yes vs No)
  • × Lower sample rate (48kHz vs 192kHz)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You need 4 XLR inputs for recording multiple sources
  • ✓ You want the stronger headphone outputs (4)
  • ✓ You want a backup take that survives a computer crash

Look elsewhere if

  • × You need the highest sample rate available (192kHz)

Best for value-focused buyers, professionals who want the best, complex setup builders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Mackie ProFX6v3+ and Rode RODECaster Pro II?

The clearest difference is records to SD card, which the Rode RODECaster Pro II has and the Mackie ProFX6v3+ does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 4 specs. They match on 5 specs, including connection type, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio mixers from Mackie and Rode, each taking a different approach to channel count and routing flexibility.

Which is better for streaming, Mackie ProFX6v3+ or Rode RODECaster Pro II?

Get the Rode RODECaster Pro II. The Rode RODECaster Pro II wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $699, so the Mackie ProFX6v3+ stays the pick if $470 matters more than those specs.

What do the Mackie ProFX6v3+ and Rode RODECaster Pro II have in common?

Both share 5 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and onboard effects (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.

Is the Rode RODECaster Pro II worth the extra $470 over the Mackie ProFX6v3+?

The Rode RODECaster Pro II costs $699.00 against $229.00, a difference of $470. The premium buys records to SD card (Yes), headphone outputs (4) and XLR inputs (4). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.

Related Comparisons

Mackie ProFX6v3+ vs Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer Compare → Rode RODECaster Pro II vs Rode RODECaster Duo Compare → Mackie ProFX6v3+ vs Yamaha MG10XU Compare → Rode RODECaster Pro II vs Allen & Heath ZED-6FX Mixer Compare → Mackie ProFX6v3+ vs Yamaha MG16XU 16-Channel Mixer Compare → Rode RODECaster Pro II vs Denon DN-300MKII DJ Mixer Compare →