Mackie ProFX6v3+ vs Rode RODECaster Pro II compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Rode RODECaster Pro II wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $699, so the Mackie ProFX6v3+ stays the pick if $470 matters more than those specs.
Unless…
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Mackie ProFX6v3+ | Rode RODECaster Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 6.3/10 |
| Channels | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 2.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 6.7/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 3.3/10 |
The Split
Creator mixer with Onyx preamps and USB interface features for streaming and recording.
On paper the Mackie ProFX6v3+ takes sample rate (192kHz, +144kHz). It gives up records to SD card and headphone outputs to the Rode RODECaster Pro II. It is the cheaper of the two, by $470.00.
Leads on
Higher sample rate processing preserves audio fidelity through the mixer.
Flagship production mixer/interface with extensive routing, processing, and multi-source creator workflows.
On paper the Rode RODECaster Pro II takes records to SD card (Yes), headphone outputs (4, +3) and XLR inputs (4, +2). It gives up sample rate to the Mackie ProFX6v3+. That costs $470.00 more than the Mackie ProFX6v3+.
Leads on
Recording to an SD card gives you a backup take that survives a computer crash.
More headphone outputs mean more guests can monitor without splitters.
More XLR inputs mean you can connect more microphones at once.
These 5 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Rode RODECaster Pro II is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is records to SD card, which the Rode RODECaster Pro II has and the Mackie ProFX6v3+ does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 4 specs. They match on 5 specs, including connection type, bit depth and phantom power. Two audio mixers from Mackie and Rode, each taking a different approach to channel count and routing flexibility.
Get the Rode RODECaster Pro II. The Rode RODECaster Pro II wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $699, so the Mackie ProFX6v3+ stays the pick if $470 matters more than those specs.
Both share 5 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes) and onboard effects (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Rode RODECaster Pro II costs $699.00 against $229.00, a difference of $470. The premium buys records to SD card (Yes), headphone outputs (4) and XLR inputs (4). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.