LG UltraGear 27GP850-B vs ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz

LG UltraGear 27GP850-B vs ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.

LG UltraGear 27GP850-B
LG
LG UltraGear 27GP850-B
$299.99
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz
ASUS
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz
$999.99

The Ruling

LG UltraGear 27GP850-B or ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz? It is a toss-up — take the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B.

Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B takes Refresh Rate, the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz takes Screen Space. With the trade even, $700 is the tiebreaker, and the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B is the cheaper side of it.

Check price on Amazon

Unless…

At a Glance

Where each one actually leads

Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.

CategoryLG UltraGear 27GP850-BASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz
Screen Space4.4/1010/10
Refresh Rate10/108.7/10
Value10/103/10

The Split

What each one wins

LG UltraGear 27GP850-B

27-inch QHD Nano IPS gaming monitor with fast response and high refresh for fluid gameplay.

On paper the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B takes refresh rate (165Hz (180Hz OC), +21Hz). It gives up resolution to the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz. It is the cheaper of the two, by $700.00.

Leads on

  • Refresh Rate +21Hz
    165Hz (180Hz OC)
    144Hz

    Higher refresh rate makes gameplay smoother on your gaming monitor.

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz

Display option aimed at creator desks, gameplay viewing, and multi-purpose editing or streaming setups.

On paper the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz takes resolution (4K). It gives up refresh rate to the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B. That costs $700.00 more than the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B.

Leads on

  • Resolution
    4K
    2560x1440

    Higher resolution means more screen space for OBS, chat, and alerts.

Where they’re identical

One spec is the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.

  • Dimensions 27-inch

The Record

7 specs, grouped by area

Full specification comparison of LG UltraGear 27GP850-B and ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz, grouped by area.
Specification
LG
LG UltraGear 27GP850-B
ASUS
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz
Screen SpaceASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz
Resolution2560x1440✓ 4K
Refresh RateLG UltraGear 27GP850-B
Refresh Rate✓ 165Hz (180Hz OC)144Hz
ConnectivityNot enough data
HDMI Portsno data2
DisplayPort Portsno data1
Connection Typedisplayport, hdmihdmi, displayport
BuildNot enough data
Dimensions27-inch27-inch
Other specsNot enough data
Panel TypeNano IPSIPS

A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.

Bottom Line

Who each one is for

The LG UltraGear 27GP850-B is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.

Our pick
Best Value

At $299.99, the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B is the most affordable option — 70% less than the priciest pick. It leads in refresh rate (165Hz (180Hz OC)). Offers the most spec advantages per dollar in this comparison.

  • + Better refresh rate (165Hz (180Hz OC) vs 144Hz)
  • × Weaker resolution (2560x1440 vs 4K)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You need 165Hz (180Hz OC) for smoother video
  • ✓ Budget is your top priority — $700.00 less than the priciest option

Look elsewhere if

  • × You want 4K or higher capture quality

Best for value-focused buyers, gamers.

The alternative
Most Connectivity

At $999.99, the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz is the priciest option — a premium pick if brand, build, or specific features matter to you. It leads in resolution (4K). More I/O options for complex setups.

  • + Better resolution (4K vs 2560x1440)
  • × Weaker refresh rate (144Hz vs 165Hz (180Hz OC))

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You want 4K capture quality

Look elsewhere if

  • × You're on a tight budget — save $700.00 with a cheaper option
  • × You need 165Hz (180Hz OC) for smoother video

Best for complex setup builders, 4k content creators.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between LG UltraGear 27GP850-B and ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz?

The largest gap is resolution, where the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz leads — 4K against 2560x1440. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 2 specs. They match on 1 spec, including dimensions. Two monitors from LG and ASUS, each taking a different approach to color accuracy and screen real estate.

Which is better for streaming, LG UltraGear 27GP850-B or ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz?

It is a toss-up — take the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B. Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B takes Refresh Rate, the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz takes Screen Space. With the trade even, $700 is the tiebreaker, and the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B is the cheaper side of it.

Is the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz worth the extra $700 over the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B?

The ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz costs $999.99 against $299.99, a difference of $700. The premium buys resolution (4K). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.

Related Comparisons

LG UltraGear 27GP850-B vs LG 27GN950-B UltraGear 27" 4K 144Hz Compare → ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP Compare → LG UltraGear 27GP850-B vs LG 27GP850-B UltraGear 27" 144Hz Compare → ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz vs ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 27" OLED 144Hz Compare → LG UltraGear 27GP850-B vs LG 27GR83QF-B UltraGear 27" 240Hz Compare → ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 4K 144Hz vs Acer Nitro XV272U Vbmiiprx 27" 144Hz Compare →