Get the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen), narrowly. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) wins Preamps and Creator Features, but only just, and the rest...
The Ruling
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) wins Preamps and Creator Features — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is the pricier of the two at $159.99, so the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) stays the pick if $10 matters more than those specs.
Unless…
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) | Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Preamps | 8.1/10 | 10/10 |
| Mic Inputs | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Connectivity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The Split
Popular 2-in/2-out USB audio interface with low-noise preamps and direct monitoring.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) takes XLR inputs (2, +1). It gives up loopback and dynamic range to the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen). It is the cheaper of the two, by $10.00.
Leads on
More XLR inputs let you record multiple microphones simultaneously.
Compact 1-mic USB-C interface for solo creators who need clean voice and instrument input.
On paper the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) takes loopback (Yes), dynamic range (120dB, +9dB) and preamp gain (57dB, +1dB). It gives up XLR inputs to the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen). That costs $10.00 more than the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen).
Leads on
Loopback routes computer audio back into the stream without a second interface or cable.
Wider converter dynamic range means less noise between the quietest and loudest parts of a take.
More gain drives quiet dynamic microphones like the SM7B without a separate booster.
These 11 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is loopback, which the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) has and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 4 specs. They match on 11 specs, including connection type, sample rate and bit depth. Two audio interfaces from Focusrite, each taking a different approach to audio quality and I/O flexibility.
Get the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen), narrowly. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo (4th Gen) wins Preamps and Creator Features — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is the pricier of the two at $159.99, so the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (3rd Gen) stays the pick if $10 matters more than those specs.
Both share 11 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), sample rate (192kHz), bit depth (24-bit) and max sample rate (192kHz), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.