Elgato HD60 X vs AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)

Elgato HD60 X vs AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.

Elgato HD60 X
Elgato
Elgato HD60 X
$179.99
AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)
AVerMedia
AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)
$299.99

The Ruling

Elgato HD60 X or AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)? Get the AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro), narrowly.

The AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) wins Capture Quality — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is the pricier of the two at $299.99, so the Elgato HD60 X stays the pick if $120 matters more than those specs.

Check price on Amazon

At a Glance

Where each one actually leads

Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.

CategoryElgato HD60 XAVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)
Capture Quality2.5/1010/10
Passthrough10/1010/10
Value10/106/10

The Split

What each one wins

Elgato HD60 X

Widely used external USB capture card with low-latency gameplay passthrough.

It gives up capture resolution to the AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro). It is the cheaper of the two, by $120.00.

Leads on

  • Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.

AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)

External HDMI capture card built for high-resolution gameplay recording and streaming workflows.

On paper the AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) takes capture resolution (4K60). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. That costs $120.00 more than the Elgato HD60 X.

Leads on

  • Capture Resolution
    4K60
    1080p60

Where they’re identical

These 2 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.

  • Connection Type usb-c, hdmi
  • Passthrough Resolution 4K60 HDR10 / 1440p120 / 1080p240

The Record

14 specs, grouped by area

Full specification comparison of Elgato HD60 X and AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro), grouped by area.
Specification
Elgato
Elgato HD60 X
AVerMedia
AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)
Capture QualityAVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)
Capture Resolution1080p60✓ 4K60
Resolutionno datano data
PassthroughEven
Passthrough Resolution4K60 HDR10 / 1440p120 / 1080p2404K60
MotionNot enough data
Refresh Rateno datano data
Audio ResolutionNot enough data
Max Sample Rateno data48kHz
Mic InputsNot enough data
XLR Inputsno datano data
ConnectivityNot enough data
HDMI Portsno datano data
Connection Typeusb-c, hdmiusb-c, hdmi
PowerNot enough data
Power Requirementno datano data
Phantom Powerno datano data
CompatibilityNot enough data
Operating Systemno datano data
Other specsNot enough data
Pcie Slotsno datano data
Interfaceno datano data
Audio Supportno datano data

A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.

Bottom Line

Who each one is for

The AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.

The alternative
Elgato HD60 X $179.99
Budget Pick

At $179.99, the Elgato HD60 X is the most affordable option — 40% less than the priciest pick. It trades raw specs for a simpler, more focused experience. Covers the essentials without stretching your budget.

  • + Low-latency design for real-time monitoring
  • × Weaker capture resolution (1080p60 vs 4K60)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ Budget is your top priority — $120.00 less than the priciest option

Look elsewhere if

  • × You want 4K60 or higher capture quality

Best for budget-conscious creators.

Our pick
Best ValuePremium Pick

The AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) is the priciest at $299.99, but leads on specs where it counts. It leads in capture resolution (4K60). Offers the most spec advantages per dollar in this comparison.

  • + Better capture resolution (4K60 vs 1080p60)

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ You want 4K60 capture quality

Look elsewhere if

  • × You're on a tight budget — save $120.00 with a cheaper option

Best for value-focused buyers, professionals who want the best, 4k60 content creators.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Elgato HD60 X and AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)?

The largest gap is capture resolution, where the AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) leads — 4K60 against 1080p60. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 1 spec. They match on 2 specs, including connection type and passthrough resolution. Two capture cards from Elgato and AVerMedia, each taking a different approach to video quality and latency.

Which is better for streaming, Elgato HD60 X or AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro)?

Get the AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro), narrowly. The AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) wins Capture Quality — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is the pricier of the two at $299.99, so the Elgato HD60 X stays the pick if $120 matters more than those specs.

Is the AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) worth the extra $120 over the Elgato HD60 X?

The AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) costs $299.99 against $179.99, a difference of $120. The premium buys capture resolution (4K60). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.

Related Comparisons

Elgato HD60 X vs Elgato 4K S Compare → AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) vs AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA 2.1 (GC553G2) Compare → Elgato HD60 X vs Elgato 4K60 Pro MK.2 Compare → AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) vs AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 Compare → Elgato HD60 X vs Elgato Cam Link 4K Compare → AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) vs AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D) Compare →