Behringer Xenyx 1204USB vs Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer wins Audio Resolution — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is the pricier of the two at $229, so the Behringer Xenyx 1204USB stays the pick if $40 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Behringer Xenyx 1204USB | Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 6.3/10 | 10/10 |
| Channels | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Routing | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Creator Features | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 8.3/10 |
The Split
Classic USB analog mixer with multiple channels, aux sends, and onboard effects for creator workflows.
On paper the Behringer Xenyx 1204USB takes aux sends (2, +1). It gives up sample rate and USB audio channels to the Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer. It is the cheaper of the two, by $40.00.
Leads on
Aux sends create separate mixes — one for your headphones, another for a guest or the stream.
Creator mixer built to manage microphones, monitoring, and multi-source audio control for streaming or production.
On paper the Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer takes sample rate (192kHz, +144kHz) and USB audio channels (4, +2). It gives up aux sends to the Behringer Xenyx 1204USB. That costs $40.00 more than the Behringer Xenyx 1204USB.
Leads on
Higher sample rate processing preserves audio fidelity through the mixer.
More USB channels let your computer receive each source separately instead of one stereo mix.
These 6 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The largest gap is sample rate, where the Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer leads — 192kHz against 48kHz. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 3 specs. They match on 6 specs, including bit depth, phantom power and XLR inputs. Two audio mixers from Behringer and Mackie, each taking a different approach to channel count and routing flexibility.
Get the Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer, narrowly. The Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer wins Audio Resolution — but only just, and the rest of the chart is close. It is the pricier of the two at $229, so the Behringer Xenyx 1204USB stays the pick if $40 matters more than those specs.
Both share 6 specifications in the catalog, including bit depth (24-bit), phantom power (Yes), XLR inputs (4) and onboard effects (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Mackie ProFX10v3 10-Channel Mixer costs $229.00 against $189.00, a difference of $40. The premium buys sample rate (192kHz) and USB audio channels (4). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.