Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer vs Zoom PodTrak P4 compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Zoom PodTrak P4 wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $199.99, so the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer stays the pick if $100.99 matters more than those specs.
Unless…
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer | Zoom PodTrak P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 9.2/10 |
| Channels | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 2.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 5/10 |
The Split
Compact analog mixer with USB integration tailored for desktop creator audio chains.
On paper the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer takes sample rate (48kHz, +3.9kHz). It gives up records to SD card and headphone outputs to the Zoom PodTrak P4. It is the cheaper of the two, by $100.99.
Leads on
Higher sample rate processing preserves audio fidelity through the mixer.
Portable podcast mixer/recorder with multiple headphone feeds and creator-first controls.
On paper the Zoom PodTrak P4 takes records to SD card (Yes), headphone outputs (4, +3) and XLR inputs (4, +2). It gives up sample rate to the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer. That costs $100.99 more than the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer.
Leads on
Recording to an SD card gives you a backup take that survives a computer crash.
More headphone outputs mean more guests can monitor without splitters.
More XLR inputs mean you can connect more microphones at once.
These 3 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Zoom PodTrak P4 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is records to SD card, which the Zoom PodTrak P4 has and the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 4 specs. They match on 3 specs, including connection type, phantom power and bluetooth. Two audio mixers from Behringer and Zoom, each taking a different approach to channel count and routing flexibility.
Get the Zoom PodTrak P4. The Zoom PodTrak P4 wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $199.99, so the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer stays the pick if $100.99 matters more than those specs.
Both share 3 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), phantom power (Yes) and bluetooth (No). None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Zoom PodTrak P4 costs $199.99 against $99.00, a difference of $101. The premium buys records to SD card (Yes), headphone outputs (4) and XLR inputs (4). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.