Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer vs Yamaha MG10XU
Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer vs Yamaha MG10XU compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer or Yamaha MG10XU? Get the Yamaha MG10XU.
The Yamaha MG10XU wins Audio Resolution, Channels and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $219.99, so the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer stays the pick if $120.99 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer | Yamaha MG10XU |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 2.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Channels | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Routing | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 6.7/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 4.5/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer
Compact analog mixer with USB integration tailored for desktop creator audio chains.
It gives up onboard effects and sample rate to the Yamaha MG10XU. It is the cheaper of the two, by $120.99.
Leads on
- Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.
Yamaha MG10XU
USB mixer with onboard effects for creator streams, podcast sessions, and multi-source monitoring.
On paper the Yamaha MG10XU takes onboard effects (Yes), sample rate (24-bit/192kHz) and XLR inputs (4, +2). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. That costs $120.99 more than the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer.
Leads on
-
Onboard EffectsYesNo
Built-in effects handle compression and EQ without routing through your computer.
-
Sample Rate24-bit/192kHz48kHz
Higher sample rate processing preserves audio fidelity through the mixer.
-
XLR Inputs +242
More XLR inputs mean you can connect more microphones at once.
Where they’re identical
These 6 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Phantom Power Yes
- Aux Sends 1
- USB Audio Channels 2
- Headphone Outputs 1
- Bluetooth No
- Records to SD Card No
The Record
22 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The Yamaha MG10XU is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer and Yamaha MG10XU?
The clearest difference is onboard effects, which the Yamaha MG10XU has and the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 3 specs. They match on 6 specs, including phantom power, aux sends and USB audio channels. Two audio mixers from Behringer and Yamaha, each taking a different approach to channel count and routing flexibility.
Which is better for streaming, Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer or Yamaha MG10XU?
Get the Yamaha MG10XU. The Yamaha MG10XU wins Audio Resolution, Channels and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $219.99, so the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer stays the pick if $120.99 matters more than those specs.
What do the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer and Yamaha MG10XU have in common?
Both share 6 specifications in the catalog, including phantom power (Yes), aux sends (1), USB audio channels (2) and headphone outputs (1), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
Is the Yamaha MG10XU worth the extra $121 over the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer?
The Yamaha MG10XU costs $219.99 against $99.00, a difference of $121. The premium buys onboard effects (Yes), sample rate (24-bit/192kHz) and XLR inputs (4). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.