Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer vs Rode RODECaster Pro II compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The Rode RODECaster Pro II wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $699, so the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer stays the pick if $600 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer | Rode RODECaster Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Resolution | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Channels | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 2.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 0/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 1.4/10 |
The Split
Compact analog mixer with USB integration tailored for desktop creator audio chains.
It gives up onboard effects and bluetooth to the Rode RODECaster Pro II. It is the cheaper of the two, by $600.00.
Leads on
Flagship production mixer/interface with extensive routing, processing, and multi-source creator workflows.
On paper the Rode RODECaster Pro II takes onboard effects (Yes), bluetooth (Yes), records to SD card (Yes) and headphone outputs (4, +3). It also leads on XLR inputs. It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. That costs $600.00 more than the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer.
Leads on
Built-in effects handle compression and EQ without routing through your computer.
Bluetooth brings phone call-ins and music into the mix wirelessly.
Recording to an SD card gives you a backup take that survives a computer crash.
More headphone outputs mean more guests can monitor without splitters.
More XLR inputs mean you can connect more microphones at once.
These 3 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The Rode RODECaster Pro II is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The clearest difference is onboard effects, which the Rode RODECaster Pro II has and the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 5 specs. They match on 3 specs, including connection type, sample rate and phantom power. Two audio mixers from Behringer and Rode, each taking a different approach to channel count and routing flexibility.
Get the Rode RODECaster Pro II. The Rode RODECaster Pro II wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $699, so the Behringer 802S Analog Streaming Mixer stays the pick if $600 matters more than those specs.
Both share 3 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (usb-c, xlr, trs), sample rate (48kHz) and phantom power (Yes). None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The Rode RODECaster Pro II costs $699.00 against $99.00, a difference of $600. The premium buys onboard effects (Yes), bluetooth (Yes) and records to SD card (Yes). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.