AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 vs Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 vs Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini: It is a toss-up, take the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573. Neither one leads on more of the...
The Ruling
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 or Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini? It is a toss-up — take the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573.
Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 takes Passthrough, the Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini takes Connectivity. With the trade even, $135.01 is the tiebreaker, and the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 is the cheaper side of it.
Unless…
- You need connectivity — get the Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 | Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capture Quality | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Passthrough | 10/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Connectivity | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 5.4/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573
Video capture device for gameplay, cameras, or HDMI sources with creator-friendly passthrough and recording support.
On paper the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 takes passthrough resolution (4K60). It gives up HDMI ports to the Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini. It is the cheaper of the two, by $135.01.
Leads on
-
Passthrough Resolution4K601080p60
Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini
Video capture device for gameplay, cameras, or HDMI sources with creator-friendly passthrough and recording support.
On paper the Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini takes HDMI ports (2, +1). It gives up passthrough resolution to the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573. That costs $135.01 more than the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573.
Leads on
-
HDMI Ports +121
HDMI input receives the video source; HDMI output sends it to your display.
Where they’re identical
One spec is the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Capture Resolution 1080p60 (dual)
The Record
14 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 and Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini?
The largest gap is passthrough resolution, where the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 leads — 4K60 against 1080p60. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 2 specs. They match on 1 spec, including capture resolution. Two capture cards from AVerMedia and Blackmagic Design, each taking a different approach to video quality and latency.
Which is better for streaming, AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 or Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini?
It is a toss-up — take the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573. Neither one leads on more of the chart than the other: the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 takes Passthrough, the Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini takes Connectivity. With the trade even, $135.01 is the tiebreaker, and the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 is the cheaper side of it.
Is the Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini worth the extra $135 over the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573?
The Blackmagic Design ATEM Mini costs $295.00 against $159.99, a difference of $135. The premium buys HDMI ports (2). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.