AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 vs AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D)

AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 vs Live Gamer Duo: Evenly matched, take the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573. On every spec we can score, the two are too close...

AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573
AVerMedia
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573
$159.99
AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D)
AVerMedia
AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D)
$229.99

The Ruling

AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 or AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D)? Evenly matched — take the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573.

Nothing on the chart above separates them: on every axis the catalog can score, the two land close enough that calling a winner would be reading noise. With the specs level, $70 is the real difference, and the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 is the cheaper side of it.

Check price on Amazon

At a Glance

Where each one actually leads

Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.

CategoryAVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D)
Capture Quality10/1010/10
Passthrough10/1010/10
Value10/107/10

The Split

How closely these line up

AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573

Video capture device for gameplay, cameras, or HDMI sources with creator-friendly passthrough and recording support.

It is the cheaper of the two, by $70.00.

Leads on

  • Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.

AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D)

Dual-input internal capture card that handles gameplay and camera feeds in one PCIe card.

That costs $70.00 more than the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573.

Leads on

  • Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.

Where they’re identical

These 4 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.

  • Connection Type hdmi
  • Capture Resolution 1080p60 (dual)
  • Interface PCIe x4
  • Passthrough Resolution 4K60

The Record

14 specs, grouped by area

Full specification comparison of AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 and AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D), grouped by area.
Specification
AVerMedia
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573
AVerMedia
AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D)
Capture QualityEven
Capture Resolution1080p60 (dual)1080p60 (dual)
Resolutionno datano data
PassthroughEven
Passthrough Resolution4K604K60
MotionNot enough data
Refresh Rateno datano data
Audio ResolutionNot enough data
Max Sample Rateno datano data
Mic InputsNot enough data
XLR Inputsno datano data
ConnectivityNot enough data
HDMI Ports1no data
Connection Typehdmihdmi
PowerNot enough data
Power Requirementno datano data
Phantom Powerno datano data
CompatibilityNot enough data
Operating Systemno datano data
Other specsNot enough data
InterfacePCIe x4PCIe x4
Pcie Slots1no data
Audio Supportno datano data

A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.

Bottom Line

Who each one is for

The AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.

Our pick
Best ValueMost Connectivity

At $159.99, the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 is the most affordable option — 30% less than the priciest pick. Offers the most spec advantages per dollar in this comparison.

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ Budget is your top priority — $70.00 less than the priciest option

Best for value-focused buyers, complex setup builders.

The alternative
Easiest Setup

At $229.99, the AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D) is the priciest option — a premium pick if brand, build, or specific features matter to you. Fewer ports and inputs — plug in and go.

  • × Most expensive at $229.99

Also worth knowing

  • ✓ Your workflow matches its specific feature set

Look elsewhere if

  • × You're on a tight budget — save $70.00 with a cheaper option

Best for beginners.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 and AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D)?

On the specifications the catalog records, these two are near-identical: they match on 4 specs and nothing measurably separates them. Two capture cards from AVerMedia, each taking a different approach to video quality and latency.

Which is better for streaming, AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 or AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D)?

Evenly matched — take the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573. Nothing on the chart above separates them: on every axis the catalog can score, the two land close enough that calling a winner would be reading noise. With the specs level, $70 is the real difference, and the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 is the cheaper side of it.

What do the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 and AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D) have in common?

Both share 4 specifications in the catalog, including connection type (hdmi), capture resolution (1080p60 (dual)), interface (PCIe x4) and passthrough resolution (4K60). None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.

Is the AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D) worth the extra $70 over the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573?

The AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D) costs $229.99 against $159.99, a difference of $70. On the catalog's specifications it does not lead the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 anywhere, so the premium buys brand, build or something the catalog does not record. Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.

Related Comparisons

AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 vs Elgato 4K S Compare → AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D) vs Rode Streamer X Compare → AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 vs Razer Ripsaw HD Capture Card Compare → AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D) vs AVerMedia PW515 Live Streamer Cam Link Compare → AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K GC573 vs AVerMedia Live Gamer ULTRA S (GC553Pro) Compare → AVerMedia Live Gamer Duo (GC570D) vs Elgato 4K60 Pro MK.2 Compare →