ART TubeMix vs Rode RODECaster Pro II
ART TubeMix vs Rode RODECaster Pro II compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
ART TubeMix or Rode RODECaster Pro II? Get the Rode RODECaster Pro II.
The Rode RODECaster Pro II wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $699, so the ART TubeMix stays the pick if $559.01 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Where each one actually leads
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | ART TubeMix | Rode RODECaster Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| Channels | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Monitoring | 2.5/10 | 10/10 |
| Creator Features | 0/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 2/10 |
The Split
What each one wins
ART TubeMix
Hybrid analog mixer with tube stage character for warm voice and instrument routing.
It gives up onboard effects and bluetooth to the Rode RODECaster Pro II. It is the cheaper of the two, by $559.01.
Leads on
- Nothing on the spec sheet goes this one’s way.
Rode RODECaster Pro II
Flagship production mixer/interface with extensive routing, processing, and multi-source creator workflows.
On paper the Rode RODECaster Pro II takes onboard effects (Yes), bluetooth (Yes), records to SD card (Yes) and headphone outputs (4, +3). It also leads on XLR inputs. It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. That costs $559.01 more than the ART TubeMix.
Leads on
-
Onboard EffectsYesNo
Built-in effects handle compression and EQ without routing through your computer.
-
BluetoothYesNo
Bluetooth brings phone call-ins and music into the mix wirelessly.
-
Records to SD CardYesNo
Recording to an SD card gives you a backup take that survives a computer crash.
-
Headphone Outputs +341
More headphone outputs mean more guests can monitor without splitters.
-
XLR Inputs +242
More XLR inputs mean you can connect more microphones at once.
Where they’re identical
One spec is the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
- Phantom Power Yes
The Record
22 specs, grouped by area
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
Who each one is for
The Rode RODECaster Pro II is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between ART TubeMix and Rode RODECaster Pro II?
The clearest difference is onboard effects, which the Rode RODECaster Pro II has and the ART TubeMix does not. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 5 specs. They match on 1 spec, including phantom power. Two audio mixers from ART and Rode, each taking a different approach to channel count and routing flexibility.
Which is better for streaming, ART TubeMix or Rode RODECaster Pro II?
Get the Rode RODECaster Pro II. The Rode RODECaster Pro II wins Channels, Monitoring and Creator Features. It is the pricier of the two at $699, so the ART TubeMix stays the pick if $559.01 matters more than those specs.
Is the Rode RODECaster Pro II worth the extra $559 over the ART TubeMix?
The Rode RODECaster Pro II costs $699.00 against $139.99, a difference of $559. The premium buys onboard effects (Yes), bluetooth (Yes) and records to SD card (Yes). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.