Apple AirPods Max Wireless Headphones vs SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless compared — specs, features, and which one to buy for your setup. See the full breakdown on CreatorConfig.
The Ruling
The SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless wins Low-End Reach, High-End Reach and Power. It is the pricier of the two at $349.99, so the Apple AirPods Max Wireless Headphones stays the pick if $150.99 matters more than those specs.
At a Glance
Every axis is scored out of 10 from the catalog specs below. The scores are relative to the products on this page, so a 10 means “best of these”, not “perfect”, and two identical columns mean the catalog genuinely cannot separate them. Axes the catalog holds no figure for on both sides are left off entirely rather than guessed at.
| Category | Apple AirPods Max Wireless Headphones | SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Low-End Reach | 8.5/10 | 10/10 |
| High-End Reach | 8.1/10 | 10/10 |
| Isolation | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Power | 9.1/10 | 10/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 5.7/10 |
The Split
Listening solution for creator monitoring, gaming, editing, and long-session comfort.
It gives up frequency response and battery life to the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless. It is the cheaper of the two, by $150.99.
Leads on
Premium wireless gaming headset with active noise cancellation and base station chat/game mix controls.
On paper the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless takes frequency response (10Hz-40kHz) and battery life (22 hours, +2hours). It concedes nothing measurable on the sheet. That costs $150.99 more than the Apple AirPods Max Wireless Headphones.
Leads on
Wider frequency response reproduces more of the audio spectrum for accurate monitoring.
Longer battery life means fewer mid-session charges on a wireless set.
These 5 specs are the same on both of them, so none of it is part of the decision.
The Record
A group is won by whoever takes more of its rows outright. Specs the catalog cannot rank are shown but never decide a group.
Bottom Line
The SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless is the pick on the specs the catalog holds, but “better on paper” and “right for you” are different questions. Each case below names what the product is actually good at and who that suits.
The largest gap is frequency response, where the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless leads — 10Hz-40kHz against 20Hz-20kHz. Across the catalog's specification sheet the two differ on 2 specs. They match on 5 specs, including operating system, fit and enclosure. Two headphones from Apple and SteelSeries, each taking a different approach to sound signature and comfort for long sessions.
Get the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless. The SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless wins Low-End Reach, High-End Reach and Power. It is the pricier of the two at $349.99, so the Apple AirPods Max Wireless Headphones stays the pick if $150.99 matters more than those specs.
Both share 5 specifications in the catalog, including operating system (windows, macos), fit (Over-ear), enclosure (Closed-back) and active noise cancelling (Yes), among others. None of those is a reason to pick one over the other.
The SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless costs $349.99 against $199.00, a difference of $151. The premium buys frequency response (10Hz-40kHz) and battery life (22 hours). Whether that is worth it depends on which of those you would actually use.